Iffy+ merges lists of sites that regularly publish mis/disinformation, as identified by major fact-checking and journalism organizations, into a single dataset. Iffy+ is more comprehensive, though less granularly documented, than the Iffy Index of Unreliable News Sources (this site’s other dataset of untrustworthy domains).
- Fake-news/misinfo lists compiled by BuzzFeed (BF), FactCheck.org (FC), PolitiFact (PF), and Wikipedia (WI).
- MBFC Conspiracy-Pseudoscience (CP) and Questionable Sources (QS) categories.
Indiana University’s Hoaxy® project will be using Iffy+ to help visualize the spread of low-credibility sources online. See the Methodology (and Corrections) sections below for details on the composition of this dataset.
Iffy+ (mis/disinfo domains)
The links in the MBFC factual column go to the site’s MBFC review. Site Rank is from Amazon/Alexa Website Traffic Statistics. The ✓s-column arrows () link to search results with fact-checks of that site’s articles. The “W” links go to the site’s Wikipedia information (if it exists), as an article or in the “List of fake news websites.” The public spreadsheet has additional data.
Inclusions and definitions
Iffy+ merges the fake-news lists of respected fact-checkers and journalists, then purges inactive sites (see Iffy–).
Iffy+ includes domains identified as unreliable in one or more of these source lists:
- BuzzFeed Fake News Sites: compiled for their “50 Of The Biggest Fake News Hits On Facebook” reports.
- FactCheck.org Misinformation Directory: “a list of websites that have posted deceptive content.” FactCheck was created by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.
- MBFC Category: Conspiracy-Pseudoscience, sites “may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.”
- MBFC Category: Questionable Sources “exhibit one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news.”
- MBFC Factual Reporting Levels: Low, “which means the source rarely uses credible sources and is simply not trustworthy for reliable information,” or Very Low, “which means the source almost never uses credible sources and is simply not trustworthy for reliable information at all.”
- PolitiFact Fake News Almanac: a “list of websites where we’ve found deliberately false or fake stories.” PolitiFact is a joint project of the Tampa Bay Times and the Poynter Institute.
- Wikipedia List of fake news websites: sites “which intentionally, but not necessarily solely, publish hoaxes and disinformation for purposes other than news satire.”
In rare cases, different trust-rating agencies disagree on a site’s reliability. Iffy+ excludes (does not list) domains with either of these trust-ratings:
- MBFC Factual Reporting Levels: Mostly Factual, High, Very High.
- NewsGuard Score: Above 65 (out of 100).
Iffy– (inactive mis/disinfo domains)
Unreliable sites often churn through domain names. When one gets discovered as a source of fake news, it goes dark. Soon after, the fake-news operation often reappears using a different domain. The Iffy– sheet (iffy minus) stores these dead domains, for historical and research purposes. Each was at one time listed on one of the above fake-news source lists.
Here’s the tally of domains on each source list, broken down by the total active (Iffy+) and inactive (Iffy–) sites in each:
|Iffy+ list active sites and Iffy– inactive ones. Unique+ is the number of active sites that are only on that one list.|
To have a site listed or unlisted, submit your request via the forms at Media Bias/Fact Check and NewsGuard. Iffy.news monitor their ratings and changes the Iffy Index and Iffy+ based on their updates. To inform us of your requested corrections, please use the form below. But remember: The lists include only sites with stories that are demonstrably false — not merely biased or partisan. Include URLs of fact-checks that demonstrate whether the site publishes fake or fact-based news.